Well, I guess, I can oblige you with a bit of copypaste. This is what I wrote in Hinkle's UT channel comments:
Putin thinks the Soviet Union was a continuation of "historical Russia" (as in, the Russian Empire of 1914). And he hates the Bolsheviks and particularly Lenin for putting "timebombs" in the foundation of the Soviet Union/Russia by making it _de jure_ a confederacy of sovereign republics. The fact that the Soviet Union was assembled on totally different foundations and for different purposes than "historical Russia", completely eludes him. Putin supported the full restoration of capitalism that he personally profited from, but he bemoans the fact that the national republics broke away in the process (in which he wasn't personally involved). He is not alone in this take. Many Russian nationalists share it. In fact, this Putin's speech was most likely written in bulk by the former culture minister Medinsky (also a Vladimir, look him up on wikipedia), who is a widely known exponent of such views.
In other words, Putin wishes he and his cronies had more territory and resources to plunder and people to exploit. He also wanted to be accepted as equal in the "high society" of the West, and the fact that he has been made into this global boogeyman makes him more unhappy than anybody else.
Fun fact: Putin was mentioned by Klaus Schwab in 2017 in the same sentence with Justin Trudeau as his WEF's "young global leader"! Apparently, he became one in the early 1990s, when he was a corrupt foreign commerce official at the townhall of St. Petersburg (under his former professor turned rabid anticommie mayor Sobchak) and facilitated dealings between the Russian mob and shady German entrepreneurs through firms registered in the principality of Liechtenstein... [deals that ranged from selling Soviet stockpiles of rare earth minerals to drug trafficking]
So that's why all his saber rattling at the Ukraine's border for the past 7 years (after the Minsk accords were signed) was nothing but a bluff. But this time his bluff got called by the West (because the West needs this hot war in the aftermath of the War on Covid and to proceed further with its Orwellian "Great Reset"). So they left Putin with no choice but to invade. And an invasion it is. BTW, there is this elephant in the room that the annexation of Crimea has not been conceded by the Ukraine, or recognized at the UN level. So, regardless of the status of the eastern separatist controlled regions up to now, technically, the current events are but an escalation of an invasion/occupation of Ukraine by Russia that's been already ongoing since 2014.
As for the people of Donetsk and Lugansk, Putin couldn't care less about them. Right now the local male population is being conscripted to be used as expendable fodder in front of the Russian army, as the push to "liberate" the Ukraine occupied areas of the newly recognized republics - beyond the Minsk accords' ceasefire line (which is about 3/4 of their "constitutional" territory, including the cities of Slavyansk, Kramatorsk and Mariupol - the latter being the base of your beloved Azov battalion) - is being mounted...
[This was written on the eve of the invasion, when it seemed that Putin was only going to limit the "special operation" to the Donbass region and then return to dragging the dead cat by the tail in the game of trying to make Washington concede the annexation of Crimea and to shove the Donbass back into Ukraine with its new "sovereign" status, necessitating a constitutional reform that would allow a greater political control of Moscow over Kiev. But when the Germans cut of the NordStream2 pipeline again (in response to the recognition of sovereignty), which forced the full-scale invasion in an attempt to restore control over the Ukrainian pipeline. Which is all Putin and his kleptocratic regime's foreign politics ever was about - the natural gas pipelines.]
Did you even read the article? Russia was looted and plunged into chaos during the 1990s by capitalism as it exists- as a structure inseparable from its domination by the west, based in London, New York, and Washington. To understand his position you have to acknowledge the obvious fact that pure 'free-market capitalism' does not exist and has not existed for decades. Read Hudson. Read about the dollar and Bretton-Woods. Putin facilitated the re-nationalization of Gazprom and made the Russian oligarchs pay taxes- the Russian standard of living between 1990 and 2020 speaks to the results. Marx predicted the centralization of capital, but what you misunderstand is the extent to which this centralized capital is represented on the world stage by the United States and its allegedly multilateral institutions, and the extent to which at a high level of centralization, the very conditions of free-market economics become irrelevant. Look at the Oil Industry; look at the military industrial complex. Are these firms which can be stood in the classic sense without contextualization in the states with which they are integrated? This is what Putin's Popular Front is against. Leftists who discount the importance of these facts are the ones living in a simplistic fantasy, but they are half way there! keep reading!
Tell me more about Russia, bro, while I'm playing my balalaika and drinking vodka with my pet bear... M'kay?
As for Gazprom, it was never privatized, so Putin could not re-nationalize it. Get your facts straight. What he and his pal Miller really did with it, though, was that they funneled the revenue from it into all sorts of ventures of zero benefit to the general public like sponsorship of sports clubs and building palaces for themselves (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millerhof).
As for the standard of living in Russia, it is true that it went up in the 2000s, as the oil prices grew, so yeah, the populace got some crumbs while the oligarchs pocketed the bulk of the money. But then 2014 happened and since then the standards of living have been on the steady decline due to the fall in oil prices and the West's sanctions over the annexation of Crimea.
There was a plan to take over the whole of Ukraine and probably divide it between Russia and the EU (Merkel), and it could be done relatively easily because the Ukrainian military wasn't equipped or motivated at all, and the population in the South and East of the country was mostly friendly towards Russia at the time. But Putin backed out of the project, because he is a coward and an idiot, and he kept hoping to push through his gas pipelines projects and shove the Donbass back into Ukraine as per the Minsk accords, and eventually somehow reconcile with the West. Now, after 7 years he finally realized that he got "tossed" (defrauded) and was left with no options but this war, which is going to be a bloody mess, lasting for many years (as they say, "the US will fight Russia till the last Ukrainian"), which will likely lead to the eventual collapse of Russia, even if it manages to win he war, which does not seem like a given at this point.
So, please, STFU about "Putin's Popular Front". The notion is DERANGED.
Who cares about free market economics? Capitalism is the mode of production dominated by capital, by the imperative to maximize capital, and that imperative is the leading motive behind all the actions of the very highest levels of these transatlantic, globalist institutions of Western hegemony, and that imperative is also behind Putin's actions Ukraine, elevating the war far beyond some merely defensive opersation for Donbas but into a full scale invasion of Ukraine.
Richard Spencer: "And, I don't know, I feel like with the Costco people (I know this is going to be an extremely cruel thing to say) but, I remember I was at-- This was many years ago, when I was in New York City actually, and I was attending this, like, debate club thing, and they had this woman who was an outright just, like, an animal rights activist. Like, she, um-- 'total abolition of carnivores.' And, you know, she was principled; you could give her that. And a couple of things would come up. Like, people would ask, you know, 'Do you want to prevent animals from killing each other? If you believe animals are sentient beings, conscious beings that have rights, do you want to prevent a lion from attacking a giraffe or whatever?' And she was like, 'Everyone always says this. I don't even want to talk about this!' And, um, you know, okay, but, you know, if you are going to be this much of a liberal, you probably should have to talk about that. And the other thing that I remember, one other person brought up, is like, you have millions-- probably 95% of the cows that currently exist exist for food production. So, ending steak eating is actually going to be, like, a dramatic (from her standpoint, horrifying) reduction of the cow population. They can't exist otherwise...
"So 99% of the cow population is there to be processed, to be slaughtered and fed to people. So, this notion that-- you're kind of in this weird dilemma. Ending steaks would actually deplete the population of cows, and so it kind of brings up that question of, like, 'What is this thing really?' And don't you think the same thing could be said for the Costco family? They exist in order to consume Costco goods or Walmart or whatever. Like, it's almost like they otherwise wouldn't exist in any other human civilization or population. And, you know, I'm kind of putting the cart before the horse here, but I think that's correct. It's like they're almost bred to exist under capitalism, and they wouldn't exist otherwise. So what is really the point of imagining that they could overcome this system or that they could exist outside of the system or that they're somehow owed something? Like once we have automation and robots we should just be feeding them more, in fact! They don't have enough. It's just-- Do you understand what I'm saying. Under no circumstance would this sort of last man, would this sort of being exist outside of democratic capitalism. So they have no incentive to change the system, in fact. They are the kings, arguably, of our current arrangement."
Spencer supporter (Cat?): "Well, truth. Remember the point I made that you know -- when we were talking about ending capitalism, you know -- like, for the evil bourgeoisie, for the evil pro-imperialists like us, whether or not the workers are automated is immaterial to us. Like, if you're working on the level of higher ideals or these sort of national grand strategy and that sort of thing -- if you worry more about, if you worry more than just, like, materialism, than that-- you know, it could be automated, it could not be automated; it doesn't really change anything for us. We're more interested in different things. But when he was talking about automation for the workers, he made a point that once we automate they can devote much more time to leisure, of all things. And I made the point -- then what is the point of the working class if you automate them and then all they can do after that is just sit around with their dick in their hands? Like there's nothing there for them..."
Spencer: "Are they going to be reading Shakespeare or something?"
Spencer supporter (JustACat): "Well even so, like, then why do we need a proletariat if they're just going to sit around and read Shakespeare. I get it, he's good, but sheesh, we don't need, you know, 40 million people devoted to reading him. And you said earlier that you thought these people would've probably -- like Hinkle or the sort of the new brown communists would probably make good Evangelical Christians. And, it makes sense if you think about it. Like, they have an almost spiritual devotion to the working class, to the point where they are this eternal being that even if you change production in some way that all of them just become lazy consumers, they are still this noble class of people that must be defended and cherished and have everything given to them no matter what. Even if you take away their fundamental character of being the workers, somehow, they are still the proletariat."
another Spencer supporter: "What we're presenting here is a challenge to Marx's idea here -- I'm looking up his phrase... as you recall, when Marx rhapsodizes about his communist utopia once we've transcended (material) scarcity. Ultimately the utopia Marx hoped for is a transcending of scarcity -- total material abundance in which everyone contributes from his excess, takes for his needs... So he explains (I'm just quoting here off the Internet): 'Communist society makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have in mind, without ever becoming a hunter, fisherman, shepherd, or so on.' So, yeah, that's the concept. The idea these guys had is that communism (as China is supposedly demonstrating) is going to usher in total post-scarcity abundance in the long term, and that post-scarcity abundance will enable the Costco family (anyone) to become philosophers if they are so inclined, and when we--"
Spencer: "But also cattle ranchers, like, they'll, you know-- and maybe even, why not just be a street sweeper for a lark. It's like, you know, I could just go out and be like, 'All right, I'll clean up the sidewalk. I mean, you know, tomorrow it's Heidegger, but you know...' because it's about breaking down of the division of labor. Well finish Chris and then I'll add to it."
the other Spencer supporter: "I'm not suggesting that we're going to give up on the double chunk chocolate cookie. I'm not suggesting that. I'm just saying they'll be able to do more than just that... I listened to that chat last night that you guys were talking about. And once Richard and JustACat poured cold water on the idea that the Costco family might be well-suited to philosophizing, you know, these guys were, 'Oh, yeah yeah, Richard and JustACat -- they're just elitists, man, yeah. Yeah, you guys can philosophize but no one else can? Yeah, right. You guys think you're like natural elites... and you guys can think but no one else can think. Oh yeah yeah, sure, working class and middle class people aren't smart, yeah. They're just dumb, right, Richard? Yeah, working class and middle class people are just dumb.' It's like, well, yeah."
Alberto Barbarossa: "I can read Shakespeare too, bro. Listen, To boom or not to boom. That is the question."
Spencer: "Well, yeah, to be fair, what was Hamlet really talking about outside of boom or doom, you know? Are you going to boom and go kill your uncle, or is it doom -- you're going to kill yourself. Boom or doom. I mean, in a way, they got to the essence of that dilemma. I mean, you know..."
Alberto Barbarossa: "Definitely."
Spencer supporter: "So yeah, they're looking forward to a society, a utopia, in which work itself is man's greatest need. That's a quote, I think, from either Marx or Lenin. You work because you want to work, not because you have to work. And once we're liberated from production, then, you know, supposedly the Costco family can lift its sights higher and maybe they will ponder the higher things. But yeah, we're supposedly going to be-- And of course, once you have total material abundance, then even the state itself can wither away because the state and the police force, these things are ultimately about, you know, safeguarding certain property relations. So once, you know, we have total material abundance -- everyone has whatever they want as soon as they want it -- there's no need for law enforcement, there's no need for the police, we don't need to protect anyone from anyone else because everyone has whatever they want as soon as they want it. So, just kind of spelling out the utopia as these guys understand it."
another Spencer supporter (JustACat?): "They called us demons -- that was the funny thing, which is-- I do think they've all taken into the Hinkleite view of the world where they're all going to become like these extreme conspiratorial Orthodox Christians, and anyone who's not supporting Putin's communist state is secretly a Satanist. But I remember, they made one point where they said that-- This wasn't Harold; this was like an even browner person who came in at the end of the conversation, like, who was speaking at us in Ebonics about how we're too elitist, which I found funny. But he said that we were just demons and we're actually happy that people were dying in imperialist wars. And I jokingly said, 'Yes. Based. Kill more people.' But now that I think about it--"
Spencer: "Well, but remember how he articulated that -- 'He was happy about Russians getting killed.' So, everything is like through this lens, like this hyper-partisan social media lens. The fact that they didn't mention Ukrainians getting killed or some, I don't know, tribesman in Africa getting killed -- it's all this weirdly, I don't know, like extremely polemical discussion, like, as if what we're watching today is a bunch of, like, innocent Russians just minding their own business just getting shot or something. It's just absurd."
-- RadixJournal Substack, "The Unnecessary Podcast" (September 3, 2024)
Sorry, don't have time to debunk every ridiculous post on the internet point by point. If the author wishes to live in a fantasy world of his own creation, and his fans are willing to join him there, then so be it. It's postmodernism, baby!
Strelkov has described exactly why tankies are so seriously stupid. He created "novorossiya", he should know why it is a magnet of apologia, disaster, and human rights catastrophe. It is one thing for tankies to ignore torture and filtration camps - we expect that - but the way that Haz argues that a STRONG ruble is good shows how deeply stupidity is part of the tankie brand. Even if they tried to do real materialist analysis, Putinites are just uniformly dumb. At least Kadyrov is honest about enjoying torture and child brides. Tankies should aspire to that kind of animalistic consistency.
Haz seems like a good example of why Russians see Armenians, Ukrainians, Dagestanis, Buryati, etc, as disposable, he is definitely some kind of mutt sub-ethnicity that no Orc would want in the dacha next door. Strictly untermenschen.
Spencer supporter (JustACat?): "Well that is the new Orthodox Christian thing. You have to remember that if you look back at the wars in, like, Chechnya where Russians were ethnically cleansing villages and raping women to death in the mountains of Chechnya to prevent them from declaring independence, to this day, the official stance of the Orthodox church is that Russia was defending itself against a terrible threat from the Muslim world by raping thousands of women to death in Chechnya. So they do have this eternal, sort of, victimhood."
Spencer. "Eternal victimhood."
Spencer supporter: "Well yeah, if you're an Orthodox Christian, the official line of pre-history -- we sort of have this thing (well not we 'cause I'm not one anymore), but just as how, like, the Nordics have this sort of pre-history for how their religion is going to end with Jörmungandr and all of that stuff, and then suddenly, the last two humans will survive with the last god and they'll restart everything. The Russians believe that there's going to be this terrible catastrophe, and the last holdout will be this holy river somewhere in the far east of Russia, and that's where humanity will rise up and start again after the war. So I find that interesting."
Spencer: "One thing that I've noticed (about the communist utopia as well) -- I mean, isn't the fact that Marx described it this way, doesn't this say something about his own identity--?"
the other Spencer supporter: "Richard, before we get to that--"
Spencer: "Yeah, sure."
Spencer supporter: "Before we get to that, can I spell out more about the kind of-- their support for Russia and the anti-Ukraine stuff, and so on?"
Spencer: "Sure."
Spencer supporter: "There is a narrative behind that as well, and it's not totally, like, kind of news cycle-driven. And one guy -- we talked about Haz and Jackson Hinkle... The third head, I think, of that three-headed beast is Caleb Maupin. And, Caleb Maupin--"
Spencer: "Oh, yes."
JustACat: "That's an old name. I haven't heard of that in a while. Sheesh."
Spencer: "That's a name I haven't heard in many years."
Spencer supporter: "I mentioned him because he spells out the kind of framework of this, I think, uh, pretty well. You can get a sense of where they're coming from. The idea is -- behind their support of Russia -- of course Russia is an ally of China; China's the future; and the idea is that basically China is bringing the socialist future into existence right now, not only within their own borders but also through larger institutions like BRICS. And BRICS, through like China-based win-win cooperation and trade is building up an international real-world alternative to capitalist exploitation. And so through the socialist cooperation of the Sinosphere and BRICS, rising as an alternative to western capitalist exploitation, basically the world is moving in that direction. That's the idea. And Russia, although not Marxist, is an example of, sort of, resource nationalism, in his view, because, like, the Russian government does control vital industries like oil and gas and so forth. And so it kind of directs them in a public-spirited way in some sense. So they see Russia as kind of this-- it's not Marxist (they acknowledge that), but it's a kind of ultimately good, sort of, halfway-house, China-aligned alternative to Western capitalism. And so, basically--"
Spencer: "So you think they're more-- Like we're wrong in a way to associate them merely as Putin shills. That's a sort of temporary convenient thing. Their ultimate loyalty is towards China -- is that correct?"
Spencer supporter: "Yes."
Spencer: "That's fascinating. I never picked up on that."
JustACat: "That's Maupin's job -- I think, has, unironically, been being an RT contributor specifically to promote cooperation with the Chinese. There's a few people like that where the Russian state essentially pays them to propagandize their own people to stick with China. And then China does something very similar where they have a lot of Chinese shills who are specifically interested in Russia's continued cooperation with China and so on and so forth. But, you know, I think the funny thing is that I actually really like the idea of the Chinese state. Life, if you-- They're not Marxist obviously, but none of that shit that communists are saying about them is really true. But they're really like this fascistic, esoteric, like, race theocracy, where they're like ancestral worship and they believe in the superiority of this eternal Chinese spirit, and they're engaging in eugenics to provide the sort of, like, perfect vessel for the eternal Chinese spirit for them to take over the world. Like, this is perfection. I don't understand why these, sort of, third-world half-breeds are so obsessed with China considering the actual, you know, basis of the existence of the Chinese state."
Spencer: "Yeah."
Spencer supporter: "This is an irony that Richard [Spencer] has pointed out before. Like, wherever you look where communism, you can say, has in some ways succeeded in the sense of being part of building a strong state, a relatively more prosperous society -- it's done so by kind of right-wing piggy back on nationalism, ethnonationalism."
Spencer: "Yeah. East Germany is an excellent example of that, but-- And it was more successful. It's interesting, 'cause there's obviously the metropolan colonial [metropolitan-colonial] aspect of the Soviet Union, but, when Putin was stationed in East Germany, he was amazed at, like, the functional quality of all of it, the consumer goods and lifestyle, things like that. It's like, who's being colonized? The point I was about to make about Marx is -- isn't this, in so many ways, a high-IQ intellectual projecting his own mentality back onto the working class? Like, I, too, have too many interests that I can keep up with. I have all these books in my library that I haven't read, I'll confess. It's like, I'll see one book, and I'll be like, 'Oh wow, I want to read that.' And then, you know, it sits there. You know, you kind of take an interest in different things because you can apply your mind to all these different subjects. It's like, 'I want to read about physics. Or I want to read about the history of baseball. Or I want to read about the Franco-Prussian War. Like, I want to do this; I want to do that.' Because with the intellectual you're just constantly curious, and you can apply your mind to different subjects. And so he's projecting that onto the working class as if they would want to, like, scientifically engage in cattle ranching and then also analyze Shakespeare. but they don't. I mean, I think their lives are ones of -- really intense -- an intense lack of curiosity. I mean, advancing the cause of the Costco family really would, like, end history in the sense of nothing more would really need to be written; nothing more would need to be explored. We could just have, like, NFL football, Costco, online porn, and your, you know, little house where you can bang your wife three times a week. Like, what else is there? Nothing...
"But what else is there for them? I mean, and it's like, 'Oh, once they stop working, they're going to become intellectually curious.' It's like, what would conceivably lead you to that conclusion?"
JustACat: "Well, I think that Marx didn't understand how evil the imperialist elites could be, because he assumed that the worst the capitalists would do is, like, starve some worker to death and maybe have a few bayoneted and move on. And really what's happened is a fundamental, like, change to the race of the working class where they're not just poorer versions of us; they are, in a sense, this, sort of, weird dumb animal that's fed 'kibble' (really, considering all of their food is processed dust now). And we have kept these poor little creatures in like an almost perpetual state of sickly deliria while they run around and they eat their Costco cookies and they go work in the factory, or whatever it is they do. I don't think-- I think if Marx was around today, he'd probably either throw in with the capitalists and say, like, 'It's too much. There's nothing we can do. The workers aren't even human anymore; they've just been bred out of existence to become animals.' Or, um, he'd just, like, become one of those crazy (I don't know what the term is) -- but they think the only way to have the revolution is to nuke everyone. And then whoever survives gets to be the new proletariat."
Spencer supporter: "Speaking of intellectual-- Talking about really existing communism or intellectual projection. I recall watching a documentary about the DDR, about East Germany, and there was one noteworthy person they interviewed. She was, I think, an actress, maybe also a dancer; she appeared in Eastern German films and so on. And she was somewhat nostalgic--she had Nostalgie-- about East Germany. 'It was a society' (she'd describe it just the way you referred to Marx) -- she described it as 'a society in which we could pursue our artistic and intellectual interests. We didn't really have to worry about paying the rent and so on. We didn't have to be, like, a struggling artist. We were able to do these things as we desired. And, yeah, we knew about (my friends and I) -- we knew about the Berlin Wall, but that didn't really bother us so much. We were free to do what we wanted to do. We had the freedom to be, you know, to make films and do dance performances and so on. So actually, it wasn't so bad.' That was her recollection of it."
Spencer: "Well, I think there's something to be said for being sheltered like that..."
Richard Spencer: "...MAGA Communism sort of makes sense in this retarded way... They are going after a population of retards that might very well buy what they're selling at some point."
-- RadixJournal Substack, "The Unnecessary Podcast" (September 3, 2024)
🤔... This Commie Bastard does NOT come off as an some overeducated moralizing Moron made out of(MixedNMatched parts-bin Moron parts originally meant to be primary pieces for putting together multiple Previously made mediocre models of many multitudes of)Other Morons pissing Platitudes into the wind, promoting the power of Pronouns, preaching the promise of staying Alert & AWARE of ANY ANNOUNCEMENT of TheAUTHORATIVE SOURCES And Act Accordingly by ALWAYS Making Sure 2 B Sure U R Piously PLAYING ALONG In Public By ALWAYS Practicing In Private to make sure to be making Sure To Believe In The Power Of Power, For the sake of WokePower AND also in WokishFolkMagic Less Ye Be Led Astray By Listening 2 The Sound Of The Words Whispered On The Wind Said by Surfing Assadist Apologists And Assets of russiaRussiaRUSSIA For They Are Getting GROOMerED (And NOT In A Great or Even Good Way As It Otherwise Is Almost Always) And Feeding On ReeeepublicanTalkingPoints That TheReeeeeeeeePublican Groomers Grooming Her Are Reading Her Thru An AirPod In Her Ear & Sent over the RadioWaves She isn't Surfing From A Fellow TalkyTalkalkTalking On A WalkyTalky Who WalkyWalkWalkWalks ALotLike looks ALOT Like & TOTALLY TALK(ingPoint)S Like... Fucking... like... TuckerFucking...
TUCKER😳CARLSON
☝️and... Russinlly RoughHousing Around In A RadicallyFarExtraFarExtremllyFarFarRightWing Way With... No... With... cant be... But it is.. with
. ☝️🙄 that's how I'm used to hearing so-called-(because-they-claim-to-be-)Marxists sound like...
And Although I'm Justa dumb
BOO(but a boomer born after the boom of the a-bomb that brought about the boomers but also a boomer born B4 the first millennials even landed, let alone B4 they let all the millennials-out-on-the-loose!)MER who doesn't have a college degree... & obvs kept getting duped by & Will continue getting duped by that OrangeMan if he is even tweeterTexts out a twit-post of 8's🍑/EghtsPeach on zocialMedia ever again, zo thanks.
Now I'm no fan of Karlos de la Marxado(YOU FOOL!) i know... But to my IgnorantFarRightConservativeEars:
Are NOT Marxists But NeoMarxists Cuz They Give Off The Same Phoney Vibes All Neo-X+ists of NeoAnyIdeology Give Off Who Want To Be Associated With X-Ideology But Don't Want To Adhere To Certain Basic or Particular Integral Tennents Because It's Too Inconvenient!!(not trivializing, if a Fundamental Tennent of X was adopting a Vegan or an Atkins(NoCarb) diet, it's just an all day permanent Inconvenience but if You want to follow X go all the way, maybe the diet was Intentionally designed to discourage attracting a Particular kind of person that with some unrelated character trait that correlates with people who are very attached to certain eating habits vs someone else who doesn't really care much about what kind of foods they can or cannot ever have again.)
☝️ Let's say You are a MultiMillionaire who made & is making Millions Monetizing, Legitimizing & CulturallyCementing themselves in the PublicConscious as A Political/Religious Guru of and/or within a Particular Ideology... 🤔... like...
AnarchoSyndicalists4WARRENism
✋wait. NM, that's it's OWN thing and Not Already Established (I mean not Seemingly broadly Established but... NOT a parody and NOT a Movement That Tolerates Even The Slightest GoodFaith Insinuation That it's a good or Jus4Funsies but might be a Jus2BaitRandosIn2EvenDaring2AskThemselvesIfTheyShouldImplyTheyAreNotDieHardCoreAllAboutWhateverCoreConceptsTheyFoundThatThatParticularSynthesis... 🐍-"Sssssynthesized"
But... Say Your A MultiMillionaire Preaching some kinda Marxist Socialism to Abuncha Mostly MiddleClass Teenz-To-20Somethings Usually LowKey Just Legitimizing Them To Hate BlueCollar(AmericanWorkingClass)Folks, A BROAD RANGE OF VERY VERY DIVERSE GROUP & OVER A VERY BROAD RANGE IN MANY CASES VERY UNINTUITIVE RANGE OF OCCUPATIONS WITH INCOMES RANGING FROM $0.00/Year to(the highest anecdotal outlier from hotel janitor to hotel maintenance worker to shipyard worker Re-Painting Ships for The Navy to foreman due2 work ethic & labor recruiter/HR due2 being PuertoRican A.F. ... well due to Being bilingual & was always needed to translate H.R. process so may as well have him do it instead of translating to anyone else... to Hey! why don't I just Become the A Contractor & bid on Jobs now that I know the processes OWN Conrunning companies while owning and especially accumulating little or no "capital"
Win Contract To Paint a Ship. Find enough Qualified & Availabile Workers, schedule huddle Negotiate Floor(Lowest Pay Each was Willing to work Job For) 4 Each Job for Each Position, consider all factors other than LaborCost and don't just put the Minimum possible but get a Rep of HighestPaying Contractor to SubContractors, win contract, when won call shipyard and contract, reserve drydock, order paint wait for October, dont microManage &/or delegate your work to Team, delegate manager responsibilities but set the pace & lead by Example of PaintingTheFuckOutOfThisShip, finish ahead of shedule & Everyone gets the same extra-off time bonus Step7 Profit keeping your Contractor HQ in yer Parents Garage & Hiring Yerself To Work As One of Your SubContractors Who Works Along With Everyone. Continue Exploiting Yourself for TheEDGE that "Intentionally Ensuring You Have Overlapping Interests With
YourCustomers
(✅TheSubs or TheGov?) & With Whom You can build a Relationship With When Choosing What
✅Product/Service To Offer
4Sale: (TheSub'sLabor OR
✅TheGov's Stolen[Taxed]CashFromStolen[Property]Land as it gives you over Traditional
Top Down/Out-of-Garage "If I Only Knew What My Workers Are All About I Could Increase Productivity... Hey! Let's Hire More Consultants From TheWhiteLiberal!")
$0.00-$10,000,000.00/Yr?
(My 4-figure income is $6,000.00/
$6k PetroDollars/yr in NYC obvs with multiple pub.assist progs so after $10k it gets kinda abstract to me $100k/$1,000k/$1M/$10B
(Depending On A Sometimes Complicated Array Of Circumstances (PAST & Present) People)
🤔...
☝️Let's take Economist, Philosopher, PoliticalScientist, Activist, Agitator, Poet & WorkingClassHero: TheHonorable Dr. SirComrade-Professor:HassanAbi P.B.U.H. Champion Of ThePeople,
BernieBro of Everyone But Lenin's BestBro, Our
|High|Van|Guardian| of TheProletariatsVGParty ScourgeOf|Spies|, Traitors, Kulaks &
Landlords RentSeeking $6k/yr
✊🏻🧔🏻-"TAX|THE|RICH!|MY|BROS!!!"
🙄-"No Hassan"
✊🏻🧔🏻-"What The Fuck, Bro you are POOR, why are you looking out for the rich you dumb Bitch!"
😐-"It's Less About Keeping It IN Their Hands & More About Keeping It From Being Consolidated Under One Moron & Falling Into His/Hym/Herpz Hands or
They/Them/DEMs Hands.
What About You?
you HyperKulak!?!?"
✊🏻🧔🏻-"Bro I NEEDED a house! But Not for NOT 4 ME But FOR My MOM, She Woulda been homeless otherwise and
SOOOO... I had to have a House, I can't help it if this is how much Homes are, That's why I Stream So Hard Everyday, I Can't Help it If TheRevolution Is Crystalizing Around Me! its Easy, You Want A Million?
Just Write A Book or Start Streaming, if You Already are,
Then
STREAM HEARDER
Anything
MarxistMade:ByMarxists:ManifestsMillions
& Just Don't Get Banned. StreaM:HARD|DREAM:HarD &
#JusDonTBRacist: !!"
😏-"OfficerPiker! You
CrackerAssCracker!
PatrolmanPiker! You WileyWhiteWigglyWorm... Why Were You SecretlyOnSurflineWorldWideWebbingWithWeaponizedWorkersOfTheWorldWendesday
Don't Be Getting me All RiledUp OverYour GoofyAss! GusanoLite NotSoNeoGusano NotEvenNeo-Gusano #NeoNutsoGusano NeoNaziGroomerGuy
Two Things You Can't Be Because Ya CAN'T
A. A WhiteMillionaireMarxist.
(86theMarxistPart)
Or
B. A WhiteMuslimUnWedSexHaver.(86theMuslimPart)
C. Can YOU Be A MuslimMarxist No.
Can U B A MarxistMuslim? Not Really. At Least Not the TheWay Hassan "Thinks" Mean.
That 2Opie22 guy CrackerAss WhiteLiberal SandCracker Hoss
STILL Wants WhitEthnoKommunistState To Be Established on Epstein's Island
Absolutely refuted, no question. Infrared rising, Mmerican hegemony deteriorating.
🦍 ☀️ 🦍 ☀️ 🦍 ☀️ 🦍
🇷🇺 💪
> "Russia is presently governed by a type of popular front,"
Like, for real? This is next level retarded.
Why not write some of merit refuting every point made, instead of dismissing it.
Well, I guess, I can oblige you with a bit of copypaste. This is what I wrote in Hinkle's UT channel comments:
Putin thinks the Soviet Union was a continuation of "historical Russia" (as in, the Russian Empire of 1914). And he hates the Bolsheviks and particularly Lenin for putting "timebombs" in the foundation of the Soviet Union/Russia by making it _de jure_ a confederacy of sovereign republics. The fact that the Soviet Union was assembled on totally different foundations and for different purposes than "historical Russia", completely eludes him. Putin supported the full restoration of capitalism that he personally profited from, but he bemoans the fact that the national republics broke away in the process (in which he wasn't personally involved). He is not alone in this take. Many Russian nationalists share it. In fact, this Putin's speech was most likely written in bulk by the former culture minister Medinsky (also a Vladimir, look him up on wikipedia), who is a widely known exponent of such views.
In other words, Putin wishes he and his cronies had more territory and resources to plunder and people to exploit. He also wanted to be accepted as equal in the "high society" of the West, and the fact that he has been made into this global boogeyman makes him more unhappy than anybody else.
Fun fact: Putin was mentioned by Klaus Schwab in 2017 in the same sentence with Justin Trudeau as his WEF's "young global leader"! Apparently, he became one in the early 1990s, when he was a corrupt foreign commerce official at the townhall of St. Petersburg (under his former professor turned rabid anticommie mayor Sobchak) and facilitated dealings between the Russian mob and shady German entrepreneurs through firms registered in the principality of Liechtenstein... [deals that ranged from selling Soviet stockpiles of rare earth minerals to drug trafficking]
So that's why all his saber rattling at the Ukraine's border for the past 7 years (after the Minsk accords were signed) was nothing but a bluff. But this time his bluff got called by the West (because the West needs this hot war in the aftermath of the War on Covid and to proceed further with its Orwellian "Great Reset"). So they left Putin with no choice but to invade. And an invasion it is. BTW, there is this elephant in the room that the annexation of Crimea has not been conceded by the Ukraine, or recognized at the UN level. So, regardless of the status of the eastern separatist controlled regions up to now, technically, the current events are but an escalation of an invasion/occupation of Ukraine by Russia that's been already ongoing since 2014.
As for the people of Donetsk and Lugansk, Putin couldn't care less about them. Right now the local male population is being conscripted to be used as expendable fodder in front of the Russian army, as the push to "liberate" the Ukraine occupied areas of the newly recognized republics - beyond the Minsk accords' ceasefire line (which is about 3/4 of their "constitutional" territory, including the cities of Slavyansk, Kramatorsk and Mariupol - the latter being the base of your beloved Azov battalion) - is being mounted...
[This was written on the eve of the invasion, when it seemed that Putin was only going to limit the "special operation" to the Donbass region and then return to dragging the dead cat by the tail in the game of trying to make Washington concede the annexation of Crimea and to shove the Donbass back into Ukraine with its new "sovereign" status, necessitating a constitutional reform that would allow a greater political control of Moscow over Kiev. But when the Germans cut of the NordStream2 pipeline again (in response to the recognition of sovereignty), which forced the full-scale invasion in an attempt to restore control over the Ukrainian pipeline. Which is all Putin and his kleptocratic regime's foreign politics ever was about - the natural gas pipelines.]
Did you even read the article? Russia was looted and plunged into chaos during the 1990s by capitalism as it exists- as a structure inseparable from its domination by the west, based in London, New York, and Washington. To understand his position you have to acknowledge the obvious fact that pure 'free-market capitalism' does not exist and has not existed for decades. Read Hudson. Read about the dollar and Bretton-Woods. Putin facilitated the re-nationalization of Gazprom and made the Russian oligarchs pay taxes- the Russian standard of living between 1990 and 2020 speaks to the results. Marx predicted the centralization of capital, but what you misunderstand is the extent to which this centralized capital is represented on the world stage by the United States and its allegedly multilateral institutions, and the extent to which at a high level of centralization, the very conditions of free-market economics become irrelevant. Look at the Oil Industry; look at the military industrial complex. Are these firms which can be stood in the classic sense without contextualization in the states with which they are integrated? This is what Putin's Popular Front is against. Leftists who discount the importance of these facts are the ones living in a simplistic fantasy, but they are half way there! keep reading!
Tell me more about Russia, bro, while I'm playing my balalaika and drinking vodka with my pet bear... M'kay?
As for Gazprom, it was never privatized, so Putin could not re-nationalize it. Get your facts straight. What he and his pal Miller really did with it, though, was that they funneled the revenue from it into all sorts of ventures of zero benefit to the general public like sponsorship of sports clubs and building palaces for themselves (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millerhof).
As for the standard of living in Russia, it is true that it went up in the 2000s, as the oil prices grew, so yeah, the populace got some crumbs while the oligarchs pocketed the bulk of the money. But then 2014 happened and since then the standards of living have been on the steady decline due to the fall in oil prices and the West's sanctions over the annexation of Crimea.
There was a plan to take over the whole of Ukraine and probably divide it between Russia and the EU (Merkel), and it could be done relatively easily because the Ukrainian military wasn't equipped or motivated at all, and the population in the South and East of the country was mostly friendly towards Russia at the time. But Putin backed out of the project, because he is a coward and an idiot, and he kept hoping to push through his gas pipelines projects and shove the Donbass back into Ukraine as per the Minsk accords, and eventually somehow reconcile with the West. Now, after 7 years he finally realized that he got "tossed" (defrauded) and was left with no options but this war, which is going to be a bloody mess, lasting for many years (as they say, "the US will fight Russia till the last Ukrainian"), which will likely lead to the eventual collapse of Russia, even if it manages to win he war, which does not seem like a given at this point.
So, please, STFU about "Putin's Popular Front". The notion is DERANGED.
Who cares about free market economics? Capitalism is the mode of production dominated by capital, by the imperative to maximize capital, and that imperative is the leading motive behind all the actions of the very highest levels of these transatlantic, globalist institutions of Western hegemony, and that imperative is also behind Putin's actions Ukraine, elevating the war far beyond some merely defensive opersation for Donbas but into a full scale invasion of Ukraine.
Richard Spencer: "And, I don't know, I feel like with the Costco people (I know this is going to be an extremely cruel thing to say) but, I remember I was at-- This was many years ago, when I was in New York City actually, and I was attending this, like, debate club thing, and they had this woman who was an outright just, like, an animal rights activist. Like, she, um-- 'total abolition of carnivores.' And, you know, she was principled; you could give her that. And a couple of things would come up. Like, people would ask, you know, 'Do you want to prevent animals from killing each other? If you believe animals are sentient beings, conscious beings that have rights, do you want to prevent a lion from attacking a giraffe or whatever?' And she was like, 'Everyone always says this. I don't even want to talk about this!' And, um, you know, okay, but, you know, if you are going to be this much of a liberal, you probably should have to talk about that. And the other thing that I remember, one other person brought up, is like, you have millions-- probably 95% of the cows that currently exist exist for food production. So, ending steak eating is actually going to be, like, a dramatic (from her standpoint, horrifying) reduction of the cow population. They can't exist otherwise...
"So 99% of the cow population is there to be processed, to be slaughtered and fed to people. So, this notion that-- you're kind of in this weird dilemma. Ending steaks would actually deplete the population of cows, and so it kind of brings up that question of, like, 'What is this thing really?' And don't you think the same thing could be said for the Costco family? They exist in order to consume Costco goods or Walmart or whatever. Like, it's almost like they otherwise wouldn't exist in any other human civilization or population. And, you know, I'm kind of putting the cart before the horse here, but I think that's correct. It's like they're almost bred to exist under capitalism, and they wouldn't exist otherwise. So what is really the point of imagining that they could overcome this system or that they could exist outside of the system or that they're somehow owed something? Like once we have automation and robots we should just be feeding them more, in fact! They don't have enough. It's just-- Do you understand what I'm saying. Under no circumstance would this sort of last man, would this sort of being exist outside of democratic capitalism. So they have no incentive to change the system, in fact. They are the kings, arguably, of our current arrangement."
Spencer supporter (Cat?): "Well, truth. Remember the point I made that you know -- when we were talking about ending capitalism, you know -- like, for the evil bourgeoisie, for the evil pro-imperialists like us, whether or not the workers are automated is immaterial to us. Like, if you're working on the level of higher ideals or these sort of national grand strategy and that sort of thing -- if you worry more about, if you worry more than just, like, materialism, than that-- you know, it could be automated, it could not be automated; it doesn't really change anything for us. We're more interested in different things. But when he was talking about automation for the workers, he made a point that once we automate they can devote much more time to leisure, of all things. And I made the point -- then what is the point of the working class if you automate them and then all they can do after that is just sit around with their dick in their hands? Like there's nothing there for them..."
Spencer: "Are they going to be reading Shakespeare or something?"
Spencer supporter (JustACat): "Well even so, like, then why do we need a proletariat if they're just going to sit around and read Shakespeare. I get it, he's good, but sheesh, we don't need, you know, 40 million people devoted to reading him. And you said earlier that you thought these people would've probably -- like Hinkle or the sort of the new brown communists would probably make good Evangelical Christians. And, it makes sense if you think about it. Like, they have an almost spiritual devotion to the working class, to the point where they are this eternal being that even if you change production in some way that all of them just become lazy consumers, they are still this noble class of people that must be defended and cherished and have everything given to them no matter what. Even if you take away their fundamental character of being the workers, somehow, they are still the proletariat."
another Spencer supporter: "What we're presenting here is a challenge to Marx's idea here -- I'm looking up his phrase... as you recall, when Marx rhapsodizes about his communist utopia once we've transcended (material) scarcity. Ultimately the utopia Marx hoped for is a transcending of scarcity -- total material abundance in which everyone contributes from his excess, takes for his needs... So he explains (I'm just quoting here off the Internet): 'Communist society makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have in mind, without ever becoming a hunter, fisherman, shepherd, or so on.' So, yeah, that's the concept. The idea these guys had is that communism (as China is supposedly demonstrating) is going to usher in total post-scarcity abundance in the long term, and that post-scarcity abundance will enable the Costco family (anyone) to become philosophers if they are so inclined, and when we--"
Spencer: "But also cattle ranchers, like, they'll, you know-- and maybe even, why not just be a street sweeper for a lark. It's like, you know, I could just go out and be like, 'All right, I'll clean up the sidewalk. I mean, you know, tomorrow it's Heidegger, but you know...' because it's about breaking down of the division of labor. Well finish Chris and then I'll add to it."
the other Spencer supporter: "I'm not suggesting that we're going to give up on the double chunk chocolate cookie. I'm not suggesting that. I'm just saying they'll be able to do more than just that... I listened to that chat last night that you guys were talking about. And once Richard and JustACat poured cold water on the idea that the Costco family might be well-suited to philosophizing, you know, these guys were, 'Oh, yeah yeah, Richard and JustACat -- they're just elitists, man, yeah. Yeah, you guys can philosophize but no one else can? Yeah, right. You guys think you're like natural elites... and you guys can think but no one else can think. Oh yeah yeah, sure, working class and middle class people aren't smart, yeah. They're just dumb, right, Richard? Yeah, working class and middle class people are just dumb.' It's like, well, yeah."
Alberto Barbarossa: "I can read Shakespeare too, bro. Listen, To boom or not to boom. That is the question."
Spencer: "Well, yeah, to be fair, what was Hamlet really talking about outside of boom or doom, you know? Are you going to boom and go kill your uncle, or is it doom -- you're going to kill yourself. Boom or doom. I mean, in a way, they got to the essence of that dilemma. I mean, you know..."
Alberto Barbarossa: "Definitely."
Spencer supporter: "So yeah, they're looking forward to a society, a utopia, in which work itself is man's greatest need. That's a quote, I think, from either Marx or Lenin. You work because you want to work, not because you have to work. And once we're liberated from production, then, you know, supposedly the Costco family can lift its sights higher and maybe they will ponder the higher things. But yeah, we're supposedly going to be-- And of course, once you have total material abundance, then even the state itself can wither away because the state and the police force, these things are ultimately about, you know, safeguarding certain property relations. So once, you know, we have total material abundance -- everyone has whatever they want as soon as they want it -- there's no need for law enforcement, there's no need for the police, we don't need to protect anyone from anyone else because everyone has whatever they want as soon as they want it. So, just kind of spelling out the utopia as these guys understand it."
another Spencer supporter (JustACat?): "They called us demons -- that was the funny thing, which is-- I do think they've all taken into the Hinkleite view of the world where they're all going to become like these extreme conspiratorial Orthodox Christians, and anyone who's not supporting Putin's communist state is secretly a Satanist. But I remember, they made one point where they said that-- This wasn't Harold; this was like an even browner person who came in at the end of the conversation, like, who was speaking at us in Ebonics about how we're too elitist, which I found funny. But he said that we were just demons and we're actually happy that people were dying in imperialist wars. And I jokingly said, 'Yes. Based. Kill more people.' But now that I think about it--"
Spencer: "Well, but remember how he articulated that -- 'He was happy about Russians getting killed.' So, everything is like through this lens, like this hyper-partisan social media lens. The fact that they didn't mention Ukrainians getting killed or some, I don't know, tribesman in Africa getting killed -- it's all this weirdly, I don't know, like extremely polemical discussion, like, as if what we're watching today is a bunch of, like, innocent Russians just minding their own business just getting shot or something. It's just absurd."
-- RadixJournal Substack, "The Unnecessary Podcast" (September 3, 2024)
Sorry, don't have time to debunk every ridiculous post on the internet point by point. If the author wishes to live in a fantasy world of his own creation, and his fans are willing to join him there, then so be it. It's postmodernism, baby!
But I hope Hakim takes this bait.
Are you on Twitter or Discord? I would like to learn more about your perspective.
No, I am not.
Cope, seethe, and dilate.
Glenn and Assange are good litmus tests, if you take either seriously, you're a patsy/mark and automatically ignored.
retarded pseudo intellectual lmao
Strelkov has described exactly why tankies are so seriously stupid. He created "novorossiya", he should know why it is a magnet of apologia, disaster, and human rights catastrophe. It is one thing for tankies to ignore torture and filtration camps - we expect that - but the way that Haz argues that a STRONG ruble is good shows how deeply stupidity is part of the tankie brand. Even if they tried to do real materialist analysis, Putinites are just uniformly dumb. At least Kadyrov is honest about enjoying torture and child brides. Tankies should aspire to that kind of animalistic consistency.
Haz seems like a good example of why Russians see Armenians, Ukrainians, Dagestanis, Buryati, etc, as disposable, he is definitely some kind of mutt sub-ethnicity that no Orc would want in the dacha next door. Strictly untermenschen.
Spencer supporter (JustACat?): "Well that is the new Orthodox Christian thing. You have to remember that if you look back at the wars in, like, Chechnya where Russians were ethnically cleansing villages and raping women to death in the mountains of Chechnya to prevent them from declaring independence, to this day, the official stance of the Orthodox church is that Russia was defending itself against a terrible threat from the Muslim world by raping thousands of women to death in Chechnya. So they do have this eternal, sort of, victimhood."
Spencer. "Eternal victimhood."
Spencer supporter: "Well yeah, if you're an Orthodox Christian, the official line of pre-history -- we sort of have this thing (well not we 'cause I'm not one anymore), but just as how, like, the Nordics have this sort of pre-history for how their religion is going to end with Jörmungandr and all of that stuff, and then suddenly, the last two humans will survive with the last god and they'll restart everything. The Russians believe that there's going to be this terrible catastrophe, and the last holdout will be this holy river somewhere in the far east of Russia, and that's where humanity will rise up and start again after the war. So I find that interesting."
Spencer: "One thing that I've noticed (about the communist utopia as well) -- I mean, isn't the fact that Marx described it this way, doesn't this say something about his own identity--?"
the other Spencer supporter: "Richard, before we get to that--"
Spencer: "Yeah, sure."
Spencer supporter: "Before we get to that, can I spell out more about the kind of-- their support for Russia and the anti-Ukraine stuff, and so on?"
Spencer: "Sure."
Spencer supporter: "There is a narrative behind that as well, and it's not totally, like, kind of news cycle-driven. And one guy -- we talked about Haz and Jackson Hinkle... The third head, I think, of that three-headed beast is Caleb Maupin. And, Caleb Maupin--"
Spencer: "Oh, yes."
JustACat: "That's an old name. I haven't heard of that in a while. Sheesh."
Spencer: "That's a name I haven't heard in many years."
Spencer supporter: "I mentioned him because he spells out the kind of framework of this, I think, uh, pretty well. You can get a sense of where they're coming from. The idea is -- behind their support of Russia -- of course Russia is an ally of China; China's the future; and the idea is that basically China is bringing the socialist future into existence right now, not only within their own borders but also through larger institutions like BRICS. And BRICS, through like China-based win-win cooperation and trade is building up an international real-world alternative to capitalist exploitation. And so through the socialist cooperation of the Sinosphere and BRICS, rising as an alternative to western capitalist exploitation, basically the world is moving in that direction. That's the idea. And Russia, although not Marxist, is an example of, sort of, resource nationalism, in his view, because, like, the Russian government does control vital industries like oil and gas and so forth. And so it kind of directs them in a public-spirited way in some sense. So they see Russia as kind of this-- it's not Marxist (they acknowledge that), but it's a kind of ultimately good, sort of, halfway-house, China-aligned alternative to Western capitalism. And so, basically--"
Spencer: "So you think they're more-- Like we're wrong in a way to associate them merely as Putin shills. That's a sort of temporary convenient thing. Their ultimate loyalty is towards China -- is that correct?"
Spencer supporter: "Yes."
Spencer: "That's fascinating. I never picked up on that."
JustACat: "That's Maupin's job -- I think, has, unironically, been being an RT contributor specifically to promote cooperation with the Chinese. There's a few people like that where the Russian state essentially pays them to propagandize their own people to stick with China. And then China does something very similar where they have a lot of Chinese shills who are specifically interested in Russia's continued cooperation with China and so on and so forth. But, you know, I think the funny thing is that I actually really like the idea of the Chinese state. Life, if you-- They're not Marxist obviously, but none of that shit that communists are saying about them is really true. But they're really like this fascistic, esoteric, like, race theocracy, where they're like ancestral worship and they believe in the superiority of this eternal Chinese spirit, and they're engaging in eugenics to provide the sort of, like, perfect vessel for the eternal Chinese spirit for them to take over the world. Like, this is perfection. I don't understand why these, sort of, third-world half-breeds are so obsessed with China considering the actual, you know, basis of the existence of the Chinese state."
Spencer: "Yeah."
Spencer supporter: "This is an irony that Richard [Spencer] has pointed out before. Like, wherever you look where communism, you can say, has in some ways succeeded in the sense of being part of building a strong state, a relatively more prosperous society -- it's done so by kind of right-wing piggy back on nationalism, ethnonationalism."
Spencer: "Yeah. East Germany is an excellent example of that, but-- And it was more successful. It's interesting, 'cause there's obviously the metropolan colonial [metropolitan-colonial] aspect of the Soviet Union, but, when Putin was stationed in East Germany, he was amazed at, like, the functional quality of all of it, the consumer goods and lifestyle, things like that. It's like, who's being colonized? The point I was about to make about Marx is -- isn't this, in so many ways, a high-IQ intellectual projecting his own mentality back onto the working class? Like, I, too, have too many interests that I can keep up with. I have all these books in my library that I haven't read, I'll confess. It's like, I'll see one book, and I'll be like, 'Oh wow, I want to read that.' And then, you know, it sits there. You know, you kind of take an interest in different things because you can apply your mind to all these different subjects. It's like, 'I want to read about physics. Or I want to read about the history of baseball. Or I want to read about the Franco-Prussian War. Like, I want to do this; I want to do that.' Because with the intellectual you're just constantly curious, and you can apply your mind to different subjects. And so he's projecting that onto the working class as if they would want to, like, scientifically engage in cattle ranching and then also analyze Shakespeare. but they don't. I mean, I think their lives are ones of -- really intense -- an intense lack of curiosity. I mean, advancing the cause of the Costco family really would, like, end history in the sense of nothing more would really need to be written; nothing more would need to be explored. We could just have, like, NFL football, Costco, online porn, and your, you know, little house where you can bang your wife three times a week. Like, what else is there? Nothing...
"But what else is there for them? I mean, and it's like, 'Oh, once they stop working, they're going to become intellectually curious.' It's like, what would conceivably lead you to that conclusion?"
JustACat: "Well, I think that Marx didn't understand how evil the imperialist elites could be, because he assumed that the worst the capitalists would do is, like, starve some worker to death and maybe have a few bayoneted and move on. And really what's happened is a fundamental, like, change to the race of the working class where they're not just poorer versions of us; they are, in a sense, this, sort of, weird dumb animal that's fed 'kibble' (really, considering all of their food is processed dust now). And we have kept these poor little creatures in like an almost perpetual state of sickly deliria while they run around and they eat their Costco cookies and they go work in the factory, or whatever it is they do. I don't think-- I think if Marx was around today, he'd probably either throw in with the capitalists and say, like, 'It's too much. There's nothing we can do. The workers aren't even human anymore; they've just been bred out of existence to become animals.' Or, um, he'd just, like, become one of those crazy (I don't know what the term is) -- but they think the only way to have the revolution is to nuke everyone. And then whoever survives gets to be the new proletariat."
Spencer supporter: "Speaking of intellectual-- Talking about really existing communism or intellectual projection. I recall watching a documentary about the DDR, about East Germany, and there was one noteworthy person they interviewed. She was, I think, an actress, maybe also a dancer; she appeared in Eastern German films and so on. And she was somewhat nostalgic--she had Nostalgie-- about East Germany. 'It was a society' (she'd describe it just the way you referred to Marx) -- she described it as 'a society in which we could pursue our artistic and intellectual interests. We didn't really have to worry about paying the rent and so on. We didn't have to be, like, a struggling artist. We were able to do these things as we desired. And, yeah, we knew about (my friends and I) -- we knew about the Berlin Wall, but that didn't really bother us so much. We were free to do what we wanted to do. We had the freedom to be, you know, to make films and do dance performances and so on. So actually, it wasn't so bad.' That was her recollection of it."
Spencer: "Well, I think there's something to be said for being sheltered like that..."
Richard Spencer: "...MAGA Communism sort of makes sense in this retarded way... They are going after a population of retards that might very well buy what they're selling at some point."
-- RadixJournal Substack, "The Unnecessary Podcast" (September 3, 2024)
🤔... This Commie Bastard does NOT come off as an some overeducated moralizing Moron made out of(MixedNMatched parts-bin Moron parts originally meant to be primary pieces for putting together multiple Previously made mediocre models of many multitudes of)Other Morons pissing Platitudes into the wind, promoting the power of Pronouns, preaching the promise of staying Alert & AWARE of ANY ANNOUNCEMENT of TheAUTHORATIVE SOURCES And Act Accordingly by ALWAYS Making Sure 2 B Sure U R Piously PLAYING ALONG In Public By ALWAYS Practicing In Private to make sure to be making Sure To Believe In The Power Of Power, For the sake of WokePower AND also in WokishFolkMagic Less Ye Be Led Astray By Listening 2 The Sound Of The Words Whispered On The Wind Said by Surfing Assadist Apologists And Assets of russiaRussiaRUSSIA For They Are Getting GROOMerED (And NOT In A Great or Even Good Way As It Otherwise Is Almost Always) And Feeding On ReeeepublicanTalkingPoints That TheReeeeeeeeePublican Groomers Grooming Her Are Reading Her Thru An AirPod In Her Ear & Sent over the RadioWaves She isn't Surfing From A Fellow TalkyTalkalkTalking On A WalkyTalky Who WalkyWalkWalkWalks ALotLike looks ALOT Like & TOTALLY TALK(ingPoint)S Like... Fucking... like... TuckerFucking...
TUCKER😳CARLSON
☝️and... Russinlly RoughHousing Around In A RadicallyFarExtraFarExtremllyFarFarRightWing Way With... No... With... cant be... But it is.. with
ExtremelyAgroExtremeFarAltWhiteWingerWhoHasHisOwnHatesPeachPodCast2PlatformElonMuskAndAlsoAleXJonez
BRO😲JOGAN...
. ☝️🙄 that's how I'm used to hearing so-called-(because-they-claim-to-be-)Marxists sound like...
And Although I'm Justa dumb
BOO(but a boomer born after the boom of the a-bomb that brought about the boomers but also a boomer born B4 the first millennials even landed, let alone B4 they let all the millennials-out-on-the-loose!)MER who doesn't have a college degree... & obvs kept getting duped by & Will continue getting duped by that OrangeMan if he is even tweeterTexts out a twit-post of 8's🍑/EghtsPeach on zocialMedia ever again, zo thanks.
Now I'm no fan of Karlos de la Marxado(YOU FOOL!) i know... But to my IgnorantFarRightConservativeEars:
TheBoutiqueLeft/Fauxgressives/FauxialDemoKrats/DemoKratikFauxialists/TheOnlineLeft/TheLockDownLeft/NeoProgressives/#LuxuryCommunists/KtyptoLibs/#RoseSityEthnoKommunists/ThePerformativeLeft/TheMargaritaMondaysInMayLimitedMaydayMarkRuffalosEditionBevolutionaryBREADedBuffaloCreameCheezeStuffedJalapenoTUBErz™SignatureAppz®/KnaturalSocialistGenderTwerkerzPartyPeople
Are NOT Marxists But NeoMarxists Cuz They Give Off The Same Phoney Vibes All Neo-X+ists of NeoAnyIdeology Give Off Who Want To Be Associated With X-Ideology But Don't Want To Adhere To Certain Basic or Particular Integral Tennents Because It's Too Inconvenient!!(not trivializing, if a Fundamental Tennent of X was adopting a Vegan or an Atkins(NoCarb) diet, it's just an all day permanent Inconvenience but if You want to follow X go all the way, maybe the diet was Intentionally designed to discourage attracting a Particular kind of person that with some unrelated character trait that correlates with people who are very attached to certain eating habits vs someone else who doesn't really care much about what kind of foods they can or cannot ever have again.)
☝️ Let's say You are a MultiMillionaire who made & is making Millions Monetizing, Legitimizing & CulturallyCementing themselves in the PublicConscious as A Political/Religious Guru of and/or within a Particular Ideology... 🤔... like...
AnarchoSyndicalists4WARRENism
✋wait. NM, that's it's OWN thing and Not Already Established (I mean not Seemingly broadly Established but... NOT a parody and NOT a Movement That Tolerates Even The Slightest GoodFaith Insinuation That it's a good or Jus4Funsies but might be a Jus2BaitRandosIn2EvenDaring2AskThemselvesIfTheyShouldImplyTheyAreNotDieHardCoreAllAboutWhateverCoreConceptsTheyFoundThatThatParticularSynthesis... 🐍-"Sssssynthesized"
But... Say Your A MultiMillionaire Preaching some kinda Marxist Socialism to Abuncha Mostly MiddleClass Teenz-To-20Somethings Usually LowKey Just Legitimizing Them To Hate BlueCollar(AmericanWorkingClass)Folks, A BROAD RANGE OF VERY VERY DIVERSE GROUP & OVER A VERY BROAD RANGE IN MANY CASES VERY UNINTUITIVE RANGE OF OCCUPATIONS WITH INCOMES RANGING FROM $0.00/Year to(the highest anecdotal outlier from hotel janitor to hotel maintenance worker to shipyard worker Re-Painting Ships for The Navy to foreman due2 work ethic & labor recruiter/HR due2 being PuertoRican A.F. ... well due to Being bilingual & was always needed to translate H.R. process so may as well have him do it instead of translating to anyone else... to Hey! why don't I just Become the A Contractor & bid on Jobs now that I know the processes OWN Conrunning companies while owning and especially accumulating little or no "capital"
Win Contract To Paint a Ship. Find enough Qualified & Availabile Workers, schedule huddle Negotiate Floor(Lowest Pay Each was Willing to work Job For) 4 Each Job for Each Position, consider all factors other than LaborCost and don't just put the Minimum possible but get a Rep of HighestPaying Contractor to SubContractors, win contract, when won call shipyard and contract, reserve drydock, order paint wait for October, dont microManage &/or delegate your work to Team, delegate manager responsibilities but set the pace & lead by Example of PaintingTheFuckOutOfThisShip, finish ahead of shedule & Everyone gets the same extra-off time bonus Step7 Profit keeping your Contractor HQ in yer Parents Garage & Hiring Yerself To Work As One of Your SubContractors Who Works Along With Everyone. Continue Exploiting Yourself for TheEDGE that "Intentionally Ensuring You Have Overlapping Interests With
YourCustomers
(✅TheSubs or TheGov?) & With Whom You can build a Relationship With When Choosing What
✅Product/Service To Offer
4Sale: (TheSub'sLabor OR
✅TheGov's Stolen[Taxed]CashFromStolen[Property]Land as it gives you over Traditional
Top Down/Out-of-Garage "If I Only Knew What My Workers Are All About I Could Increase Productivity... Hey! Let's Hire More Consultants From TheWhiteLiberal!")
$0.00-$10,000,000.00/Yr?
(My 4-figure income is $6,000.00/
$6k PetroDollars/yr in NYC obvs with multiple pub.assist progs so after $10k it gets kinda abstract to me $100k/$1,000k/$1M/$10B
(Depending On A Sometimes Complicated Array Of Circumstances (PAST & Present) People)
🤔...
☝️Let's take Economist, Philosopher, PoliticalScientist, Activist, Agitator, Poet & WorkingClassHero: TheHonorable Dr. SirComrade-Professor:HassanAbi P.B.U.H. Champion Of ThePeople,
BernieBro of Everyone But Lenin's BestBro, Our
|High|Van|Guardian| of TheProletariatsVGParty ScourgeOf|Spies|, Traitors, Kulaks &
Landlords RentSeeking $6k/yr
✊🏻🧔🏻-"TAX|THE|RICH!|MY|BROS!!!"
🙄-"No Hassan"
✊🏻🧔🏻-"What The Fuck, Bro you are POOR, why are you looking out for the rich you dumb Bitch!"
😐-"It's Less About Keeping It IN Their Hands & More About Keeping It From Being Consolidated Under One Moron & Falling Into His/Hym/Herpz Hands or
They/Them/DEMs Hands.
What About You?
you HyperKulak!?!?"
✊🏻🧔🏻-"Bro I NEEDED a house! But Not for NOT 4 ME But FOR My MOM, She Woulda been homeless otherwise and
SOOOO... I had to have a House, I can't help it if this is how much Homes are, That's why I Stream So Hard Everyday, I Can't Help it If TheRevolution Is Crystalizing Around Me! its Easy, You Want A Million?
Just Write A Book or Start Streaming, if You Already are,
Then
STREAM HEARDER
Anything
MarxistMade:ByMarxists:ManifestsMillions
& Just Don't Get Banned. StreaM:HARD|DREAM:HarD &
#JusDonTBRacist: !!"
😏-"OfficerPiker! You
CrackerAssCracker!
PatrolmanPiker! You WileyWhiteWigglyWorm... Why Were You SecretlyOnSurflineWorldWideWebbingWithWeaponizedWorkersOfTheWorldWendesday
Don't Be Getting me All RiledUp OverYour GoofyAss! GusanoLite NotSoNeoGusano NotEvenNeo-Gusano #NeoNutsoGusano NeoNaziGroomerGuy
Two Things You Can't Be Because Ya CAN'T
A. A WhiteMillionaireMarxist.
(86theMarxistPart)
Or
B. A WhiteMuslimUnWedSexHaver.(86theMuslimPart)
C. Can YOU Be A MuslimMarxist No.
Can U B A MarxistMuslim? Not Really. At Least Not the TheWay Hassan "Thinks" Mean.
That 2Opie22 guy CrackerAss WhiteLiberal SandCracker Hoss
STILL Wants WhitEthnoKommunistState To Be Established on Epstein's Island
🤔Soo What IS Hassan's WhiteBitchIdeology?
. ★ReVolutionary🕶️BroCialist★
. 🤘🏻Do YOU😎BRO Marx?🖕🏻
. "#DoYouEvenMarxBro?"
.
Incredibly based and schizopilled